Chief AI AI Neanderthal The AI Cookbook Free: Chief AI · AI Cookbook · AI Neanderthal →
AI Use Case Cracking · AI Use Case Building

Bring us the need. We'll show you if it works.

A working proof of concept on your own case, on our infrastructure, starting within days. You leave with the setup for building it, and Building follows only if it's worth it.

  • Starts within days
  • No new access to your systems
  • Demo always included
  • Proposal within 24 hours
Cracked cases

What we've cracked, and how it ended.

Each tile is a real need, a demo of what we built, and an honest outcome, including the ones where the answer was "not yet".

Fictional data

Screen tour · 5 min

Revenue Book

Every deal, delivery and invoice in one place.

A concept we built on sample data: deals, delivery and invoice schedules, and checks, in one tool.

Where's the line?

Your IT is the line between proving and building.

Two steps, two different promises. The first proves the use case without asking your IT for anything. The second builds it where it has to live.

Cracking vs Building in 52 seconds

AI Use Case Cracking

Promise
We prove it works on your own case.
Where it runs
On our infrastructure, or on access you already have
What your IT gives
Nothing new
How fast it starts
Within days
How long it takes
About one to three weeks
What you get
A working demo, what works and what doesn't, and the agreed setup
Price
One fixed price, in the proposal

AI Use Case Building

Promise
We build it where it has to live.
Where it runs
On your tenant and your systems
What your IT gives
Scoped access it grants and can revoke
How fast it starts
As soon as your IT is ready
How long it takes
About one to two weeks of build once access is in place
What you get
The solution running in your environment, documented and handed over to a named owner
Price
One fixed price, agreed at the end of Cracking

The test is simple: if new access to your systems has to be granted, it's Building.

Why start with Cracking

  1. 1

    You see it working before you pay to build it.

  2. 2

    If it can't be done, you find out for the price of a proof, not a build.

  3. 3

    Building starts from an agreed architecture and a fixed price, not a fresh conversation.

Who builds?

You have your own technical team

Crack only

Your team takes the agreed setup and builds it. If our Builder cohort trained them, that's the plan working.

You don't have builders in-house

Cracking, then Building

We build it in your systems, and support it by the hour after go-live.

About 3 minutes

Crack my use case. Proposal within 24 hours.

Six short steps. Your answers tell us how big the case is, so the proposal fits it.

Step 1 of 6

The need

What should happen, for whom, and what would "working" look like?

Where does this happen today?

Who's involved

How many teams or roles have a stake in it?

How many management levels need to agree?

The material

How many systems or file types does it touch?

Does any of it come in these forms? (pick any)

Access and rules

Does who-sees-what depend on role or country?

Does anyone have to clear it before real data moves? (pick any)

Who builds afterwards

If it works, who would build it in your systems?

Where to send it

Sent

Your use case is with us.

  1. We read your answers today.
  2. Your proposal, with one fixed price for Cracking, reaches you within 24 hours.
  3. If you want, we walk you through it in a 30-minute call.

Questions we often hear

Can't you just build it?

We will, once you've seen it work and agreed what "it" is. Cracking turns the build into a fixed conversation instead of an open one.

What if it doesn't work?

Then we show you the demo and explain exactly why, and you've saved the cost of the build. That's a complete outcome.

We already know it's possible.

Then Cracking is short. What you're buying is the architecture and the evidence: the part your IT will ask for.

Why does Cracking run on your systems?

So it can start in days instead of months, and so we learn what your environment really needs before anyone commits.

Why does Building need access to ours?

Because that's where it has to run. Access is scoped, granted by your IT, and revocable.

What if our IT won't grant access?

Then we say so before you commit. The prerequisites are confirmed at the end of Cracking.

One paragraph is enough. We'll take it from there.

What should happen, for whom, and what "working" would mean. Your proposal arrives within 24 hours.

Prefer to talk?

Crack my use case